According to the National Catholic Reporter 6 women have been ordained as Roman Catholic Priests this year by duly consecrated bishops. Additionally, a total of 32 female priests have been ordained in the past two years. These numbers represent female priests in the United States, but do not include significant numbers of women priests ordained in several other countries.
What is going on here? Can this be a significant movement, or are we looking at a meaningless gesture of a fringe group of dissidents whose actions will be forgotten in short order? Only time, of course, will tell. But while we are waiting for time to tell us, what are we to make of this women priest movement in the Roman Catholic Church?
The Bishops of the dioceses in which these ordinations have taken place have condemned them. The Vatican says that all associatied with these events are automatically excommunicated. The ordinations are said to be invalid. They are certainly illicit. No one can question that they go against current church regulations. The ordinations are only invalid, however, if one accepts the premise that it has been ordained by God that women are by reason of biology incapable of being ordained priests. The female Bishop who ordained these women was consecrated, as far as we know, by a male Roman Catholic Bishop who was in good standing in the Church at the time. Just as the question of the validity of Anglican Orders was debated in the Church for many years, the validity of these ordinations will be a subject of much scholarly discussion for years to come. It can't be decided by a fiat from Rome.
I am actually surprised to see women's ordination rise to the level of a key issue in Church reform circles. I would have imagined married priests, birth control, or some other such issue as being the key question that would spark a major movement. Clearly I underestimated the passion and determination of women, particularly women in the Church. I would not be surprised if the Vatican too may be grossly underestimating the power of women in this regard. A look at the history of women, especially in this country, on the isue of the right to vote, the right to compete for jobs with men in every area tells us that once women decide they intend to have a seat at the table, they will not stop until it occurs. The Vatican may discover it can only resist the onslaught of women for so long.
It's really hard to argue against the right of women to hold positions of authority in the Church, as the Anglicans found out. The scriptural evidence is inconclusive, and can in no way legitimately be used to rule out women priests no matter what Rome might say. The role of women in the Church has been such a dominant one that the notion that the 'old boys network' can continue to call the shots indefinitely is unlikely. Nuns have of course run schools and hospitals, and have had growing influence in the operation of parishes. Lay women have been the mainstay of support in terms of attendance, participation, devotion, and doing everything from cleaning to providing leadership in many parish activities. I don't believe women are going to continue to allow themselves to be second class citizens in the Church for much longer.
I recommend reading the homily of Fr. Roy Bourgeois which can be found in the National Catholic Reporter. Fr. Bourgeois is a Maryknoll priest who concelebrated the ordination Mass and gave the homily in support of the woman being ordained. I believe something is brewing in the Catholic Church today. Clearly as in most organizations change seldom comes from the top down. The Second Vatican Council was a major exception to that rule, and God bless Pope John the XXIII for his actions. The courageous women who are making a statement with their ordinations could represent a blossoming of the work of the Holy Spirit from below. It is a long overdue development. Come Holy Spirit.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Greetings! Saw your post in Google Blogsearch and came to read.
>"what are we to make of this women priest movement in the Roman Catholic Church?"
Um, the movement is not within the Church, but from outside the Church. The RCWP is a secular organization not affiliated with the Church. None of the ordinations have been held in Catholic Churches. None of the "ordained" women serve in a Catholic parish. All the evidence points to this movement being outside the Church.
>"The ordinations are only invalid, however, if one accepts the premise that it has been ordained by God that women are by reason of biology incapable of being ordained priests."
Not so. The ordinations are also invalid if it has been ordained by God that women are incapable of being ordained priests for non-biological reasons or even a combination of biological and non-biological reasons.
>"The female Bishop who ordained these women was consecrated, as far as we know, by a male Roman Catholic Bishop who was in good standing in the Church at the time."
That doesn't make her either a priest nor a bishop. There's still the theological problem of invalid matter.
>"It can't be decided by a fiat from Rome."
Um, yes, it can and has. Your comparison to the Anglicans is unfortunate as they lack the Petrine office and its inherent God-given authority. The Pope holds the keys of authority given by Christ to Peter in Matthew 16:15-19 and per Isaiah 22:22 acts with the authority of Christ.
The RCWP have yet to provide any answer as to what authority they have to "ordain" women as priests. If RCWP have solved the theological lack of authority for ordaining women as priests, why do they not publish their theology?
The RCWP seems to have watched their Anglican sisters and saw the Anglican hierarchy give in within two years. I suspect the RCWP thought the same would happen within the Church if women were ordained. Its now been seven years with no change by the Church. The RCWP seem stymied and frustrated that the same change has not occured in the Church. Further, there is no sign of any pending change in the Church after seven years.
>"I would have imagined married priests, birth control, or some other such issue as being the key question that would spark a major movement."
Why? Catholics have married Catholic priests. There are over 100 married Catholic priests in the U.S. alone, many with children.
Catholics are free to use natural birth control and have for many centuries.
Why would a movement develop for things that already exist?
>"they will not stop until it occurs. The Vatican may discover it can only resist the onslaught of women for so long."
The Church is over 2,000 years old and has withstood far more serious heresies than the RCWP. The women will all eventually die, the Church will not. Both have Christ's assurance.
>"I don't believe women are going to continue to allow themselves to be second class citizens in the Church for much longer."
Women are not second-class citizens in the Church regardless of RCWP propoganda.
>"Fr. Bourgeois is a Maryknoll priest who concelebrated the ordination Mass and gave the homily in support of the woman being ordained."
Fr. Bourgeois is about to become Roy, another excommunicated Catholic outside the Church, regardless of his homily.
>"I believe something is brewing in the Catholic Church today."
All the evidence is that whatever is "brewing" is brewing outside the Church.
>"The courageous women who are making a statement with their ordinations could represent a blossoming of the work of the Holy Spirit from below."
Might be from below, but the work of the Holy Spirit is doubtful. Were the movement of the Holy Spirit the results would surely be different.
God bless...
+Timothy
Timothy,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments. You are probably right on a number of points. The institutional church does find it very difficult to make change, but that's precisely why church members need to apply pressure. Without pressure priests would still be moved from parish to parish in Boston and elsewhere to abuse children. Vatican II taught us that we are all Church, not just Pope and Bishops.
I do have a question for you, though. As you said, we already have married priests. Why not even on this non-controversial issue can the institutional Church not agree to expand this pool if only incrementally, experimentally, in some countries???
Pat's Post
>"Why not even on this non-controversial issue can the institutional Church not agree to expand this pool if only incrementally, experimentally, in some countries???"
For the same reasons that the institutional church does not experiment with orange juice instead of wine for communion or apply recycled french fry grease instead of olive oil for confirmation. Invalid matter remains invalid matter.
God bless...
+Timothy
Timothy,
I'm confused. We agreed that married priests are already and have been in the past part of the Roman Catholic Church - including St. Peter himself. Why not have more of them? Often the answer is , a financial one - you would have to pay them too much money etc. That's why I said to experiement in a few selected places. There is no invalid matter involved here.
Pat's Post
Post a Comment